Federal appeals panel: LRADs can be considered excessive force
New York
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Tent shelter for migrant teens open indefinitely
ߦ   What are the costs of raising police use of force to a 'higher standard'?
ߦ   YouTube pranksters accused of impersonating Houston police face judge after video shows them pulling people over
ߦ   IN MEMORIAM - Bryce Kenneth (B.K) Smith
ߦ   Alert: rash of vehicle burglaries in Houston Heights and Woodland Heights
ߦ   Dead baby found in trunk during drug search at West Side home
ߦ   FBI: San Antonio man used Snapchat to trick young girl into sending nude selfies
ߦ   Galveston driver hits three police motorcycles while racing
ߦ   Houston-Galveston Area Council Regional DWI Task Force Patrol During July 4th Weekend
ߦ   Search for Missing Woman and her Son in Lake Livingston Successful
ߦ   Shooting Investigation At Grapevine Apartments
ߦ   Battle Of The Badges Blood Drive
ߦ   Burger King Refused Service To Deputies Then Demanded They Apologize
ߦ   Burnet County Sheriff's Office - Inmate/Arrests Summary
ߦ   Capital Gazette Shooter I.D.'d As Jarrod Ramos, Had Beef With Paper
ߦ   Dallas Police Traffic Enforcement Declines Sharply with Fewer Officers
ߦ   Department of Justice Announces New Immigration Compliance Requirements for FY 2018 Grants
ߦ   DPS Increases Traffic Enforcement for Fourth of July Holiday
ߦ   FBI Announces the Line-of-Duty Death of Former Special Agent Brian L. Crews
ߦ   Former ICE Chief Counsel Sentenced to Four Years in Prison for Wire Fraud and Aggravated Identity Theft Scheme
ߦ   Former Rockcastle County Deputy Sheriff Indicted for Using Excessive Force Against Arrestee and for Obstructing Justice
ߦ   Gunman Threatens to Shoot Employee While Walking Out of Home Depot (VIDEO)
ߦ   Harris County sergeant treated after touching fentanyl-laced flyer, officials say
ߦ   Law enforcement officers in Texas launch lip-sync battle that goes viral
ߦ   Montgomery County Constable, Pct. 4 - Arrest Blotter
ߦ   National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in Charges Against 601 Individuals Responsible for Over $2 Billion in Fraud Losses
ߦ   National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in Charges Against 601 Individuals Responsible for Over $2 Billion in Fraud Losses
ߦ   Officer Involved in Shooting Identified
ߦ   Paris Police Dept - Daily Activity/Arrests Summary
ߦ   Santa Fe police chief visits to talk school safety for Central Texas
ߦ   SWAT Serves Three Arrest Warrants: Recovers Cache of Weapons and Narcotics
ߦ   TMPA gives official statement on editorial cartoon
ߦ   Woman Sentenced to 5 Years in Prison for Drug Possession Charge
ߦ   Burnet County Sheriff's Office - Daily Inmate/Arrests Summary
ߦ   Chief Sued For Mandating Religious Counseling To Create A 'Saved' Department

 
Search Archives:

A federal appeals panel ruled Wednesday that cops' use of Long Range Acoustic Devices against protesters can be considered excessive force

By Victoria Bekiempis

New York Daily News

NEW YORK — A federal appeals panel ruled Wednesday that cops' use of noise cannons against peaceful protesters can be considered excessive force.

Three judges from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued their decision in Manhattan Federal Court case over the use of sound cannons at a December 2014 protest.

New York City Police Sgt. Janet Jordan gives orders using a Long Range Acoustic Device during a training drill in preparation for the Republican National Convention, Thursday, Aug, 19, 2004 in New York. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)
New York City Police Sgt. Janet Jordan gives orders using a Long Range Acoustic Device during a training drill in preparation for the Republican National Convention, Thursday, Aug, 19, 2004 in New York. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

Six people attending that protest, which developed after a grand jury decided not to indict any police officers in the chokehold death of Eric Garner, claim NYPD cops wrongly blasted them with Long Range Acoustic Devices, or LRADs.

The attendees, represented by lawyers Gideon Orion Oliver, Elena L. Cohen and Michael Decker, alleged they endured pain and migraines from the sound blast.

"In a narrow ruling, we hold that purposefully using a LRAD in a manner capable of causing serious injury to move non-violent protesters to the sidewalks violates the Fourteenth Amendment under clearly established law," the decision said.

The Second Circuit panel also rejected two cops' push for immunity from the lawsuit, claiming they weren't informed that nonviolent protesters were protected from excessive force.

"In their view, because this Court has not applied 'substantive due process principles to crowd control,' the officers lacked notice that the right against excessive force applies to nonviolent protesters," the decision said. "But that is like saying police officers who run over people crossing the street illegally can claim immunity simply because we have never addressed a (constitutional) claim involving jaywalkers."

"This would convert the fair notice requirement into a presumption against the existence of basic constitutional rights," the ruling also stated.

Asked for comment on the ruling, the city Law Department said "We are reviewing the decision."

©2018 New York Daily News

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet  
© 1999-2018 The Police News. All rights reserved.