Texas back in federal court over anti-'sanctuary cities' law
Court of Appeals, New Orleans
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   The Story of Herman Youngst, Badge No. 5, Houston Police Dept
ߦ   2nd Kansas sheriff's deputy dies after shooting
ߦ   Body of Missing Female discovered in field, Investigation On-going
ߦ   Gang member gets 45 years for fatal head-on crash
ߦ   Jury selection process begins for ex-cop charged with murder
ߦ   Jury Sentences Man To 4 Years For Assaulting Police Officer
ߦ   Missing Swimmer’s Body Found in Peach Creek
ߦ   Reward Increased to $10,000 for Most Wanted Sex Offender from North Texas
ߦ   San Antonio police escort daughter of fallen officer to graduation
ߦ   Texas Municipal Police Association PAC Endorses Governor Greg Abbott For Re-election
ߦ   Texas police dress up as superheroes, surprise kids at children's hospital
ߦ   Trespassers cause damage at construction site
ߦ   Woman accuses fiance, a police officer, of assault
ߦ   Deputies Tase Shoplifter In Target Parking Lot
ߦ   2018 Texas CPAAA and Law Enforcement Training Convention
ߦ   CAT team on the prowl for contraband at Bexar County jail
ߦ   Coast Guard medevacs mariner near Cameron, Louisiana
ߦ   COLD CASE FILES: Mysterious unsolved deaths in the Houston area
ߦ   Drunk Driver Crashes Into Constables Patrol Car
ߦ   Federal appeals panel: LRADs can be considered excessive force
ߦ   Fla. man killed, officer wounded while exchanging gunfire
ߦ   Galveston County Commissioners Court Agenda - June 18
ߦ   Government regulations target kids and their lemonade stands
ߦ   Houston police officer buys groceries for man targeted by thief at Walmart
ߦ   Mexican Citizen Sentenced to 235 Months in Federal Prison For His Role in a Methamphetamine Distribution Conspiracy
ߦ   Neighbors describe chaotic scene after more than 50 immigrants found in truck
ߦ   Not All Heroes Wear Capes
ߦ   Police union outraged over SC high school’s summer reading list
ߦ   Search underway for escaped inmate who vanished from Memorial Hermann Hospital in The Woodlands
ߦ   Texas City Police Chief Announces Retirement
ߦ   Texas Military Bases Possible Tent Cities for Immigrant Children
ߦ   Forensic team reveals new details in investigation of severed head found in trash bag at Lake Houston
ߦ   Investigation into Male Found Deceased at 1831 West 23rd Street
ߦ   Person of interest named in case of missing Bexar County 15-year-old
ߦ   “Affluenza Mom” Back In Jail

   Next >>
 
Search Archives:
Attorneys for the state of Texas are set to head back before the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans on Tuesday to defend the state’s new immigration enforcement law, Senate Bill 4, against charges that the measure is discriminatory and violates the U.S. Constitution.But the Texas attorney general’s office enters the courtroom with some wind at its back after a three-judge panel of the court allowed parts of the controversial law to go into effect in late September.

Gov. Greg Abbott signed SB 4 into law in May, but several local governments, including the cities of Houston, Austin, San Antonio and El Cenizo, as well as Maverick and El Paso counties, filed suit to block the measure from going into effect.

As passed, SB 4 allows local law enforcement officers to question the immigration status of people they detain or arrest and punishes local government department heads and elected officials who don’t cooperate with federal immigration "detainers" — requests by agents to turn over immigrants subject to possible deportation — in the form of jail time and penalties that exceed $25,000.

U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia in late August halted several parts of the bill, including the provision that requires jail officials to honor all detainers. He also blocked other sections that prohibit local entities from pursuing “a pattern or practice that 'materially limits' the enforcement of immigration laws” and another that prohibits “assisting or cooperating” with federal immigration officers as reasonable or necessary. He did not block the part of the bill that says police chiefs, sheriffs and other department heads cannot forbid officers from questioning a person’s immigration status.

The state of Texas countered after Garcia’s ruling and asked a three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit to lift Garcia’s ruling while the case played out. The panel ruled the detainer provision could stand but the part that requires local jails to “comply with, honor and fulfill” detainers does not require detention based on every detainer issued. The panel also determined that law enforcement officers, including campus police, with “authority that may impact immigration” cannot be prevented from assisting federal immigration officers. 

Attorneys will argue on Tuesday on whether Garcia’s initial injunction should be in effect until he rules on the substance of SB 4 in its entirety.

Nina Perales, vice president of litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is representing several of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said among the issues is whether SB 4 violates the First Amendment.

Opponents say the law's language prohibits law enforcement officers from speaking out against SB 4 or crafting policies that don’t focus on immigration enforcement. They also claim the law violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which states that immigration laws are a federal — not a state — responsibility.

Perales said issues related to the Fourth Amendment — prohibiting illegal search and seizure — could also arise because the previous panel allowed the bulk of the detainer provision to stand. At issue, she said, is “whether SB 4’s mandatory detainer provision could force counties — primarily [the government entities] with jails — to violate a person’s Fourth Amendment rights.”

During a conference call with reporters last week, MALDEF president and general counsel Thomas Saenz said there’s no way to predict when a ruling will be made after Tuesday’s arguments.

“They can take as long as they would like. In the meantime, Judge Garcia’s injunction, as modified by the [three-judge panel’s ruling], will remain the law until this panel makes its decision,” he said.

But the 5th Circuit’s eventual ruling might not be the last word, Saenz added, because either side could petition the U.S. Supreme Court to make the final determination on whether Texas can craft its own immigration-enforcement provisions and how far-reaching they can be.

A spokesperson in Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office did not respond to an email seeking comment about Tuesday’s proceedings.

Tuesday’s debate will be the latest in what’s been a year-long battle over the legislation. Filed in November 2016 and deemed an “emergency item” by Abbott, the legislation was the subject of marathon public testimony in Senate and House committee hearings, where witnesses were overwhelmingly against the measure. 

After the bill was signed, protesters took to the State Capitol on the last day of the regular legislative session and disrupted proceedings in the House to the extent that the lower chamber was forced to recess until the Department of Public Safety cleared the gallery.

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet   Shared 2 times
© 1999-2018 The Police News. All rights reserved.