Texas Police News.jpg
Galco.jpg
                  

  


 

AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
Austin
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   California Man Pleads Guilty to $3.5 Million Scam-PAC Fraud
ߦ   Coast Guard medevacs crew member from bulk carrier vessel off Galveston
ߦ   Coast Guard rescues 3 from water after vessel capsizes near Port Isabel
ߦ   Death in Custody at Travis County Jail
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Sgt. Donald L. Martin - Retired 1994
ߦ   Friendswood Police Activity Report
ߦ   Man charged with attempted murder
ߦ   Mardi Gras Sponsors Sought
ߦ   Officials: Deputies fatally shot pilot deputized to have gun
ߦ   Paris Police Investigation Fatal Shooting
ߦ   Police oversight conference meets in Fort Worth in September
ߦ   Secretary Scott Encourages Eligible Texans to Register to Vote by October 11
ߦ   2 children, 2 adults killed after drunk driver crashes into golf cart in Galveston, police say
ߦ   Injured Hitchcock police officer shoots fleeing high-speed chase suspect, police say
ߦ   Alabama Execution of Joe Nathan James Marred by Failures to Set IV Line, Embarrassing Dress-Code Controversy, and Disrespect of Victim’s Family
ߦ   California State and Federal Courts Overturn Three Death Sentences
ߦ   Federal Appeals Court Finds South Carolina Judge Ignored Uncontested Evidence of Mental Illness, Reverses Death Sentence
ߦ   Former Oklahoma Governor and His Death Penalty Review Commission Co-Chair Call for Execution Halt
ߦ   Massive turnout for gun buyback event in Third Ward surprises city officials
ߦ   Reward offered for information leading to hit-and-run driver

 
Search Archives:

AUSTIN- Attorney General Paxton joined a Kentucky-led amicus brief to support Ohio’s petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in the capital case Shoop v. Cunningham, No. 21-1587. The Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit adopted a view of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that encourages harassment of jurors sitting in judgment on capital punishment cases because it invites evidence that impeaches the jury’s deliberations, which is both vague and inadmissible.  

 

The amicus brief argues that courts have long acknowledged the need to protect jurors from harassment to preserve the integrity of the jury process in criminal cases and urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment to prevent erosion of those protections. 

 

This Court has repeatedly recognized the important guardrails that underpin AEDPA, which require federal courts to respect the finality of state-court judgments,” the brief states. “Federal courts are prohibited from ‘needlessly prolong[ing]’ a case. . . . Yet nothing could be more needless than allowing a federal court to hold an evidentiary hearing to explore the ramifications of inadmissible evidence. 

 

To read a copy of the amicus brief click here. 

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2022 The Police News. All rights reserved.