Texas Police News.jpg
                  

  


 

AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
Austin
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Houston Man Sentenced To 58 Years In Prison for Beating A Stranger To Death In A Parking Lot
ߦ   Murder, Capital Murder Trials Move to Front of the Line
ߦ   National Night Out October 3, 2023
ߦ   Office of the Attorney General Files Appeal to Texas Supreme Court, Blocking District Judge’s Ruling and Upholding Protections For Children From “Gender Transition” Procedures
ߦ   PETA claims UTMB Galveston's neglect led to lab animals’ demise
ߦ   Young Child Shot in a Road Rage Incident
ߦ   20-year sentence given to Dickinson man who shot acquaintance to death in Clear Lake area
ߦ   Friendswood Police Activity Report
ߦ   Galveston County: La Marque police make arrest in 2017 capital murder case
ߦ   Man accused of openly carrying handgun and ammo while walking toward Baytown campus out on bond
ߦ   Clear the Shelters pet adoption event comes back to Fort Worth
ߦ   Request for Opinion
ߦ   Retired PO Johnnie W. Kirtley - Retired 1995
ߦ   Today is National Fentanyl Prevention and Awareness Day
ߦ   Antonio Armstrong Jr. Sentenced to Life in Prison for Murdering His Parents
ߦ   Arrest In Election Fraud Case
ߦ   Car Wash Manager Sentenced to 30 Years For Killing Former Employee
ߦ   Charges Filed Against Habitual Offender Accused of Shooting Police Officers
ߦ   Coast Guard rescues 5 boaters near Matagorda, Texas
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Senior Police Officer George Gutierrez - Retired 2017

 
Search Archives:

AUSTIN- Attorney General Paxton joined a Kentucky-led amicus brief to support Ohio’s petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in the capital case Shoop v. Cunningham, No. 21-1587. The Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit adopted a view of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that encourages harassment of jurors sitting in judgment on capital punishment cases because it invites evidence that impeaches the jury’s deliberations, which is both vague and inadmissible.  

 

The amicus brief argues that courts have long acknowledged the need to protect jurors from harassment to preserve the integrity of the jury process in criminal cases and urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment to prevent erosion of those protections. 

 

This Court has repeatedly recognized the important guardrails that underpin AEDPA, which require federal courts to respect the finality of state-court judgments,” the brief states. “Federal courts are prohibited from ‘needlessly prolong[ing]’ a case. . . . Yet nothing could be more needless than allowing a federal court to hold an evidentiary hearing to explore the ramifications of inadmissible evidence. 

 

To read a copy of the amicus brief click here. 

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2023 The Police News. All rights reserved.