Texas Police News.jpg



Paxton Files Amicus to Ensure that Unelected Entities Do Not Exercise Undue Influence Over Dallas Citizens
Austin, TX
More Today's News:
ߦ   Fort Bend County Jury Assesses 22-Year Prison Sentence for Murder Defendant
ߦ   Habitual Offender Sentenced to 80 Years for Murder in Front of Acres Homes Convenience Store
ߦ   Fla. sheriff's sergeant dies of heart attack after altercation with suspect
ߦ   Ill. officer charged with using excessive force on man strapped to ambulance gurney
ߦ   In the age of social media, how are police learning to inform the public better after shootings?
ߦ   Officer placed in chokehold by mall patron rescued by bystander
ߦ   Prosecutor seeks joint trial for 7 deputies, 3 hospital workers charged in patient's death
ߦ   Arson/Aggravated Assault Arrest
ߦ   Austin doctors who treated trans kids leaving Dell Children’s clinic after AG Paxton announces investigation
ߦ   Coast Guard, tugboat crew rescue 2 from capsized boat near Freeport
ߦ   Colorado Man Wanted in Denver Slaying Sentenced to Life in Prison for Houston Murder
ߦ   Fetch your purpose and raise a future service dog
ߦ   Fort Bend County Honors COVID-19 Frontline Workers and Pandemic Partners
ߦ   Fort Worth officers fatally shoot man during SWAT situation, police say
ߦ   Fort Worth’s Crisis Intervention Team improves mental health response
ߦ   Four Men Sentenced for Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise
ߦ   FWPD shifts into high gear to tackle reckless driving
ߦ   FWPD suspects their strategies will tackle turnover
ߦ   Harris County DA’s Office Has Diverted Thousands of Youths From Criminal System
ߦ   Jury Convicts Priest of Sex Trafficking Three Victims

Search Archives:

AUSTIN – Attorney General Paxton filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Texas to roll back powers that were unlawfully granted to an unelected body that oversees Dallas’s municipal employees’ retirement fund. 


In accordance with state law, the Dallas City Council established by ordinance the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Dallas (“ERF”). However, in violation of the Texas Constitution, the ordinance has a provision that any changes to the code governing the ERF must be approved by the ERF’s board of trustees. This functionally gave an unelected body of seven individuals veto power that is neither warranted nor lawful.  


The issue came to a head when the City attempted to impose term limits on board members. The ERF board, comprised of unelected individuals, improperly maintained that the City required their approval to do so. The ERF board then sued, arguing that the limits are unlawful amendments that the board does not approve.  


The amicus brief was filed to outline that the earlier delegation of veto power to an unelected body such as the ERF board conflicts with the Texas Constitution and should be reversed.  


The amicus brief concludes: “In sum, ERF has pointed to no clear statement from the Legislature giving the city council the extraordinary power to bind its hands regarding the structure of its pension plan (or anything else relevant to this case). In the absence of such a clear statement, the Court should conclude that no such power exists, that Dallas’s current city council may amend the acts of its predecessors, and that the term limits imposed on ERF’s board are valid. 


To read the full amicus brief, click here.  

Post a comment
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2023 The Police News. All rights reserved.