Texas Police News.jpg



Paxton Files Amicus to Ensure that Unelected Entities Do Not Exercise Undue Influence Over Dallas Citizens
Austin, TX
More Today's News:
ߦ   Judge disqualified from Santa Fe shooting case
ߦ   Paxton Issues Statement on Catastrophic Illegal Immigration Surge Orchestrated by Biden Administration as Title 42 is Set to Expire
ߦ   Police News Links
ߦ   Repeat Sex Offender Sentenced to 20 Years in Prison for Two Attacks
ߦ   Social Media Threat
ߦ   Cedar Park Police Officer Arrested
ߦ   Cedar Park SWAT Incident
ߦ   Coast Guard suspends search for missing swimmer in Surfside
ߦ   Crosby Man Sentenced to 45 Years for Huffman-area Murder
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Sergeant Thomas M. Ray Jr. - Retired 1980
ߦ   Driver in deadly Brownsville car crash charged with manslaughter in incident outside migrant shelter
ߦ   Foreign National Extradited to the United States for Kidnapping and Assaulting U.S. Army Soldiers in Colombia
ߦ   Fort Worth cracks down on boarding homes
ߦ   Fort Worth’s Gun Unit targets shootings with new approach
ߦ   Fugitive of the Week: Richard Roberts
ߦ   Houston Man Who Killed Two, Injured Third Sentenced to 49 Years in Prison
ߦ   Investigators examine ideology of Texas gunman
ߦ   Jury Convicts Four Leaders of the Proud Boys of Seditious Conspiracy Related to U.S. Capitol Breach
ߦ   Paxton Announces Investigation into Dell Children’s Medical Center for the Potentially Illegal Performance of Gender Transitioning Procedures
ߦ   Statement From Attorney General Ken Paxton on Recent Violence at Texas State Capitol

Search Archives:

AUSTIN – Attorney General Paxton filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Texas to roll back powers that were unlawfully granted to an unelected body that oversees Dallas’s municipal employees’ retirement fund. 


In accordance with state law, the Dallas City Council established by ordinance the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Dallas (“ERF”). However, in violation of the Texas Constitution, the ordinance has a provision that any changes to the code governing the ERF must be approved by the ERF’s board of trustees. This functionally gave an unelected body of seven individuals veto power that is neither warranted nor lawful.  


The issue came to a head when the City attempted to impose term limits on board members. The ERF board, comprised of unelected individuals, improperly maintained that the City required their approval to do so. The ERF board then sued, arguing that the limits are unlawful amendments that the board does not approve.  


The amicus brief was filed to outline that the earlier delegation of veto power to an unelected body such as the ERF board conflicts with the Texas Constitution and should be reversed.  


The amicus brief concludes: “In sum, ERF has pointed to no clear statement from the Legislature giving the city council the extraordinary power to bind its hands regarding the structure of its pension plan (or anything else relevant to this case). In the absence of such a clear statement, the Court should conclude that no such power exists, that Dallas’s current city council may amend the acts of its predecessors, and that the term limits imposed on ERF’s board are valid. 


To read the full amicus brief, click here.  

Post a comment
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2023 The Police News. All rights reserved.