Texas Police News.jpg



Paxton Petitions Texas Supreme Court to Reverse Lower Court’s Decision in Case Determining Child Custody
Austin, TX
More Today's News:
ߦ   Habitual Offender Sentenced to 80 Years for Murder in Front of Acres Homes Convenience Store
ߦ   Fla. sheriff's sergeant dies of heart attack after altercation with suspect
ߦ   Ill. officer charged with using excessive force on man strapped to ambulance gurney
ߦ   In the age of social media, how are police learning to inform the public better after shootings?
ߦ   Officer placed in chokehold by mall patron rescued by bystander
ߦ   Prosecutor seeks joint trial for 7 deputies, 3 hospital workers charged in patient's death
ߦ   Arson/Aggravated Assault Arrest
ߦ   Austin doctors who treated trans kids leaving Dell Children’s clinic after AG Paxton announces investigation
ߦ   Coast Guard, tugboat crew rescue 2 from capsized boat near Freeport
ߦ   Colorado Man Wanted in Denver Slaying Sentenced to Life in Prison for Houston Murder
ߦ   Fetch your purpose and raise a future service dog
ߦ   Fort Bend County Honors COVID-19 Frontline Workers and Pandemic Partners
ߦ   Fort Worth officers fatally shoot man during SWAT situation, police say
ߦ   Fort Worth’s Crisis Intervention Team improves mental health response
ߦ   Four Men Sentenced for Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise
ߦ   FWPD shifts into high gear to tackle reckless driving
ߦ   FWPD suspects their strategies will tackle turnover
ߦ   Harris County DA’s Office Has Diverted Thousands of Youths From Criminal System
ߦ   Jury Convicts Priest of Sex Trafficking Three Victims
ߦ   Mental Health Jail Diversion Center expands eligibility

Search Archives:

AUSTIN – Attorney General Paxton filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Texas to ensure appropriate custody decisions are made on behalf of Texas children and to ensure that Texas appellate courts review legal judgments correctly and uniformly 


The case involves a determination of whether four children should live primarily with their mother or with their father. In these cases, among other considerations, a pertinent factor isthe desires of the child.” The Texas Family Code states that trial courts “shall” interview a child who is at least twelve years old to determine the child’s wishes. The couple’s oldest child was twelve years old, but the trial court failed to conduct an in camera interview, despite the mother’s request.   


The Dallas-based Fifth Court of Appeals recognized that the trial court was wrong to refuse to interview the child, but the Court misapplied the harmless-error doctrine and incorrectly ruled that the failure to conduct an in camera interview did not cause any harm.  


The Supreme Court of Texas should reverse the court of appeals’ judgment, affirm the rights of children to have their voices heard in these sensitive matters, and ensure that the harmless-error doctrine is uniformly applied throughout Texas’s legal system. 


The amicus brief states: “The State agrees with Petitioner that the trial court erred. And because the trial court’s error means the substance and significance of M.N.’s in camera interview is unknown, the error prevents the appellate courts from assessing whether the error likely affected the judgment—the best-interests determination. In finding the error harmless, the court of appeals misapplied the harmless-error doctrine. Its judgment should be reversed.” 


To read the full amicus brief, click here.  

Post a comment
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2023 The Police News. All rights reserved.