Texas Police News.jpg



Paxton Petitions Texas Supreme Court to Reverse Lower Court’s Decision in Case Determining Child Custody
Austin, TX
More Today's News:
ߦ   Paxton Issues Statement on Catastrophic Illegal Immigration Surge Orchestrated by Biden Administration as Title 42 is Set to Expire
ߦ   Police News Links
ߦ   Repeat Sex Offender Sentenced to 20 Years in Prison for Two Attacks
ߦ   Social Media Threat
ߦ   Cedar Park Police Officer Arrested
ߦ   Cedar Park SWAT Incident
ߦ   Coast Guard suspends search for missing swimmer in Surfside
ߦ   Crosby Man Sentenced to 45 Years for Huffman-area Murder
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Sergeant Thomas M. Ray Jr. - Retired 1980
ߦ   Driver in deadly Brownsville car crash charged with manslaughter in incident outside migrant shelter
ߦ   Foreign National Extradited to the United States for Kidnapping and Assaulting U.S. Army Soldiers in Colombia
ߦ   Fort Worth cracks down on boarding homes
ߦ   Fort Worth’s Gun Unit targets shootings with new approach
ߦ   Fugitive of the Week: Richard Roberts
ߦ   Houston Man Who Killed Two, Injured Third Sentenced to 49 Years in Prison
ߦ   Investigators examine ideology of Texas gunman
ߦ   Jury Convicts Four Leaders of the Proud Boys of Seditious Conspiracy Related to U.S. Capitol Breach
ߦ   Paxton Announces Investigation into Dell Children’s Medical Center for the Potentially Illegal Performance of Gender Transitioning Procedures
ߦ   Statement From Attorney General Ken Paxton on Recent Violence at Texas State Capitol
ߦ   Coast Guard medevacs crew member from fishing vessel 12 miles off Freeport

Search Archives:

AUSTIN – Attorney General Paxton filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Texas to ensure appropriate custody decisions are made on behalf of Texas children and to ensure that Texas appellate courts review legal judgments correctly and uniformly 


The case involves a determination of whether four children should live primarily with their mother or with their father. In these cases, among other considerations, a pertinent factor isthe desires of the child.” The Texas Family Code states that trial courts “shall” interview a child who is at least twelve years old to determine the child’s wishes. The couple’s oldest child was twelve years old, but the trial court failed to conduct an in camera interview, despite the mother’s request.   


The Dallas-based Fifth Court of Appeals recognized that the trial court was wrong to refuse to interview the child, but the Court misapplied the harmless-error doctrine and incorrectly ruled that the failure to conduct an in camera interview did not cause any harm.  


The Supreme Court of Texas should reverse the court of appeals’ judgment, affirm the rights of children to have their voices heard in these sensitive matters, and ensure that the harmless-error doctrine is uniformly applied throughout Texas’s legal system. 


The amicus brief states: “The State agrees with Petitioner that the trial court erred. And because the trial court’s error means the substance and significance of M.N.’s in camera interview is unknown, the error prevents the appellate courts from assessing whether the error likely affected the judgment—the best-interests determination. In finding the error harmless, the court of appeals misapplied the harmless-error doctrine. Its judgment should be reversed.” 


To read the full amicus brief, click here.  

Post a comment
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2023 The Police News. All rights reserved.