Hartman loses appeal in suit stemming from arrest while trying to serve judge during court
Beaumont, Texas
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Sex offender sent to prison for immigration and SORNA violations
ߦ   Shot and Killed In The Line Of Duty
ߦ   Texas meth ring handed massive sentences
ߦ   'The ultimate sacrifice': Officer killed in line of duty leaving behind 2 daughters, fiancĂ©
ߦ   Update to Suspicious Death Investigation
ߦ   Woman imprisoned after attempt to smuggle meth with son i
ߦ   Authorities seek human smuggler who illegally transported Chinese and other nationals
ߦ   Cedar Park Police Investigating Suspicious Death
ߦ   Commissioner Acts to Stop Two Offerings As Crypto Sweep Concludes
ߦ   Former Beaumont fire chief loses immunity appeal
ߦ   Former employee admits guilt in $63K bank embezzlement scheme
ߦ   Former Gulf Cartel comandante receives significant prison sentence
ߦ   Houston man charged in Laredo for transporting nearly 100 undocumented aliens
ߦ   Nearly Half of All Texas Traffic Deaths Come From Energy-Producing Areas
ߦ   Prop 10 Aims to keep K-9s, Handlers Together After Retirement
ߦ   Second area man sent to prison for child pornography charges
ߦ   Storm attorney Eric Dick continues to flood courts with appraisal suits
ߦ   Who would ever be a cop?
ߦ   Former LEO charged with civil rights violations
ߦ   Glen Rosa Homicide

 
Search Archives:

BEAUMONT – From trying to serve a judge during court to being involved in a bounty hunt gone very wrong, Stephen Hartman has grabbed his share of headlines over the past years.

On Sept. 19, the Ninth Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s ruling dismissing Hartman’s malicious prosecution lawsuit brought against the estate of Joe Alford.

In May 2013, Hartman attempted to serve former Judge Layne Walker while he was on the bench. He was charged with interfering with public duties and disrupting a public meeting.

Alford was appointed as district attorney pro tem and prosecuted the case against Hartman in Orange County, charging him with a Class B misdemeanor of Hindering a Proceeding by Disorderly Conduct.

The charges were ultimately dropped, but that didn’t stop Hartman from suing everyone involved.

In his claims against Alford, Hartman asserted Alford had no legal authority to prosecute him and that Alford knew that he was engaging in a malicious and illegal prosecution, court records show.

Hartman further asserted that because Alford was a private attorney and not a government employee, he is not entitled to prosecutorial immunity.

Alford argued that he was and a trial court granted his plea to the jurisdiction, prompting Hartman to appeal.

“The only legal issue is whether Alford acted within the scope of his prosecutorial duties by engaging in activities intimately associated with the judicial process,” the opinion states. “Hartman’s subjective belief or the subjective belief of other witnesses that Alford engaged in an extra-judicial conspiracy does not change the fact that Alford’s activities entitled him to absolute prosecutorial immunity.”

Hartman is represented by Beaumont attorney John Morgan.

The estate of Alford is represented by attorneys Frank Calvert and Blair Clarke.

Appeals case No. 09-19-00051-Cv

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2019 The Police News. All rights reserved.