Texas Police News.jpg
                  

  


 

AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
Austin
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Entry Level Police Officer Exam - Santa Fe Police Dept.
ߦ   Hutto Police Department - Hiring Police Officers
ߦ   Texas A&M University - Galveston
ߦ   Recruiting? Contact Texas Police News For Help Recruiting!
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Executive Office Assistant Candice G. Wade
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Police Officer Charles E. Butler
ߦ   Deputy Juan Pena At Work
ߦ   Don't Say You Are a Cop When You Shoplift
ߦ   Former Supervisory Correctional Officer Sentenced for Abusing a Hawaii Inmate and Leading a Conspiracy to Cover Up the Beating
ߦ   Jury Gives Child Molester Maximum Sentence
ߦ   Police Blotter
ߦ   Police News Links
ߦ   Police Pursuit Video
ߦ   Texas Bar Foundation is Making a Big Impact Toward Justice for Youth
ߦ   10 Charged in Business Email Compromise and Money Laundering Schemes Targeting Medicare, Medicaid, and Other Victims
ߦ   5 killed after gunman opens fire at LGBTQ nightclub in Colorado Springs
ߦ   Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke Delivers Remarks Announcing Investigation of Oklahoma’s Mental Health Service System and Oklahoma City’s and Oklahoma Police Department’s Response to Mental Health Crises
ߦ   Baton Rouge Man Sentenced for Animal Fighting Venture Crimes
ߦ   BJS RELEASES POLICE DEPARTMENTS PERSONNEL, 2020, AND SHERIFFS' OFFICES PERSONNEL 2020
ߦ   Dallas cop arrested for shooting at another officer

   Next >>
 
Search Archives:

AUSTIN- Attorney General Paxton joined a Kentucky-led amicus brief to support Ohio’s petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in the capital case Shoop v. Cunningham, No. 21-1587. The Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit adopted a view of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that encourages harassment of jurors sitting in judgment on capital punishment cases because it invites evidence that impeaches the jury’s deliberations, which is both vague and inadmissible.  

 

The amicus brief argues that courts have long acknowledged the need to protect jurors from harassment to preserve the integrity of the jury process in criminal cases and urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment to prevent erosion of those protections. 

 

This Court has repeatedly recognized the important guardrails that underpin AEDPA, which require federal courts to respect the finality of state-court judgments,” the brief states. “Federal courts are prohibited from ‘needlessly prolong[ing]’ a case. . . . Yet nothing could be more needless than allowing a federal court to hold an evidentiary hearing to explore the ramifications of inadmissible evidence. 

 

To read a copy of the amicus brief click here. 

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2022 The Police News. All rights reserved.