Texas Police News.jpg
                  

  


 

AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
Austin
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke Delivers Remarks Announcing Investigation of Oklahoma’s Mental Health Service System and Oklahoma City’s and Oklahoma Police Department’s Response to Mental Health Crises
ߦ   Baton Rouge Man Sentenced for Animal Fighting Venture Crimes
ߦ   BJS RELEASES POLICE DEPARTMENTS PERSONNEL, 2020, AND SHERIFFS' OFFICES PERSONNEL 2020
ߦ   Dallas cop arrested for shooting at another officer
ߦ   Fugitive Couple Extradited to the United States from Montenegro to Begin Prison Sentences for $20 Million Fraud
ߦ   Paris P.D. Blotter
ߦ   Police News Links
ߦ   Political Consultant Convicted for Scheme Involving Illegal Foreign Campaign Contribution to 2016 Presidential Campaign
ߦ   Public comments requested on BJS information collection activities: Data Security Requirements for Accessing Confidential Data
ߦ   Repeat DWI offender sentenced to 35 years for fatal drunken driving crash
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Sergeant Wylie “Don” Nickell
ߦ   Local Police Departments Personnel, 2020 and Sheriffs’ Offices Personnel, 2020
ߦ   Paxton Expands Investigation into Companies Denying Parents and Guardians Access to Their Children’s Medical Records
ߦ   Police News Links
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Assistant Chief Franklin E. Yorek
ߦ   Election Night Returns Portal Now Available
ߦ   Learn about Municipal Court judges, Teen Court
ߦ   Lubbock Resident Accused of Fraudulent Investment Schemes Just Months After Release From Federal Supervision
ߦ   Officer Termination
ߦ   Paris Police Arrests Fugitives

 
Search Archives:

AUSTIN- Attorney General Paxton joined a Kentucky-led amicus brief to support Ohio’s petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in the capital case Shoop v. Cunningham, No. 21-1587. The Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit adopted a view of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that encourages harassment of jurors sitting in judgment on capital punishment cases because it invites evidence that impeaches the jury’s deliberations, which is both vague and inadmissible.  

 

The amicus brief argues that courts have long acknowledged the need to protect jurors from harassment to preserve the integrity of the jury process in criminal cases and urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment to prevent erosion of those protections. 

 

This Court has repeatedly recognized the important guardrails that underpin AEDPA, which require federal courts to respect the finality of state-court judgments,” the brief states. “Federal courts are prohibited from ‘needlessly prolong[ing]’ a case. . . . Yet nothing could be more needless than allowing a federal court to hold an evidentiary hearing to explore the ramifications of inadmissible evidence. 

 

To read a copy of the amicus brief click here. 

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2022 The Police News. All rights reserved.