Texas Police News.jpg
Galco.jpg
                  

  


 

Baker fined for refusing to make transgender transition cake
Denver
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Thousands of LAPD Employees to Ask for Vaccine Exemption
ߦ   ‘As Bad As It Gets’: Nebraska Judge Sentences Man to 52 Years for Repeatedly Hanging 2-Year-Old to Unconsciousness, Filming Abuse
ߦ   2 Florida middle schoolers arrested for allegedly plotting mass school shooting
ߦ   Apple’s App Store Dealt Blow by Judge in Epic Antitrust Case
ߦ   Child molester gets 20 years in prison
ߦ   Clear Lake gas leak forces closure of Harris County Precinct 8 Constable's Office
ߦ   Coast Guard continues to support Hurricane Ida recovery efforts
ߦ   Former NFL Players Plead Guilty to Nationwide Health Care Fraud Scheme
ߦ   Man Pleads Guilty to the Sexual Abuse of a Two-Year-Old and a Seven-Year-Old Child in Order to Produce Images of the Abuse
ߦ   Mayor Appoints Somebody With No Police Experience As Head Of Police Academy
ߦ   Recifivism of Prisoners Released In 24 States
ߦ   Washington Police Reform Law Prohibits Cops From Stopping Armed Carjacker, Letting Suspects Get Away
ߦ   Calif. county jail violates inmates' rights, 'harms people it incarcerates,' DOJ report finds
ߦ   Coast Guard ends search for missing 14-year-old boy
ߦ   Florida CO trainee killed in accidental shooting
ߦ   Justice Department Announces First Federal Agents to Use Body-Worn Cameras
ߦ   Justice Department Issues Guidance on Federal Statutes Regarding Redistricting and Methods for Electing Public Officials
ߦ   Labor Day Press Release
ߦ   Officer Involved Shooting
ߦ   Police Officer, Fire Fighter Charged with Federal Civil Rights Offenses

 
Search Archives:






DENVER (AP) — A Colorado baker who won a partial victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018 for refusing to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple violated the state’s anti-discrimination law by refusing to make a birthday cake for a transgender woman, a state judge has ruled.

In Tuesday’s ruling, Denver District Judge A. Bruce Jones said Autumn Scardina was denied a cake that was blue on the outside and pink on the inside to celebrate her gender transition on her birthday because of her transgender status in violation of the law. While Jack Phillips said he could not make the cake because of its message, Jones said the case was about a refusal to sell a product, not compelled speech.

He pointed out that Phillips testified during a trial in March that he did not think someone could change their gender and he would not celebrate “somebody who thinks that they can.”

“The anti-discrimination laws are intended to ensure that members of our society who have historically been treated unfairly, who have been deprived of even the every-day right to access businesses to buy products, are no longer treated as ‘others,’ ” Jones wrote.

The group representing Phillips, Alliance Defending Freedom, said Wednesday that it would appeal the ruling, which ordered him to pay a $500 fine. The maximum fine for each violation of Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act is $500. But it was not clear from the ruling if the fine was for the two attempts that Scardina made to order the cake or just one.

“Radical activists and government officials are targeting artists like Jack because they won’t promote messages on marriage and sexuality that violate their core convictions,” the group’s general counsel, Kristen Waggoner, said in a statement.

Scardina, an attorney, attempted to order the cake on the same day in 2017 that the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would hear Phillips’ appeal in the wedding cake case. Scardina said she wanted to “challenge the veracity” of Phillips statements that he would serve LGBT customers, but her attempt to get a cake was not a “set up” intended to file a lawsuit, Jones said.

One of Scardina’s attorneys, John McHugh, said the case is about how LGBT people are treated, not just what happened to her.

“This is about a business that is open to the public that simply says to an entire class of people in the community that your identity, who you are, is something that is objectional,” he said.



Comments:
A doctor, lawyer can refuse to see a patient or client on moral or ethical grounds how come this is different?
Posted by Topcat at 6/19/2021 8:42:09 AM

This is simple:

XX Chromosomes in your cells = female
XY Chromosomes in your cells = male

There IS nothing else. Can cannot transform into another gender in the human species. Sure, science works and is accepted for global warming but not genetics in the democratic liberal party. Liberals are strange.
Posted by Sasquatch at 6/21/2021 2:36:24 PM

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2021 The Police News. All rights reserved.