Texas Police News.jpg
                  

  


 

AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
Austin
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Bookkeeper Pleads Guilty to Embezzling Over $29 Million
ߦ   Coast Guard interdicts 5 lancha crews, seizes 590 pounds of illegal fish off Texas coast
ߦ   Four Arrested in Cedar Park Jugging Incident
ߦ   Major cases headed to Galveston County courts in 2023
ߦ   Paxton Announces Multistate Settlement with CarMax Over the Disclosure of Safety Recalls
ߦ   Paxton Urges SCOTUS to Allow States to Hold Big Tech Companies Accountable When Illegal Activity Occurs
ߦ   Police News Links
ߦ   Former federal agent convicted of corruption in connection to illicit Syrian relationship
ߦ   Friendswood Police Activity Report
ߦ   Fugitive of the Week: Pedro Martin-Olivares
ߦ   Man wounded by gunfire outside Texas City nightclub
ߦ   Paxton Announces Settlement with iHeartMedia for Recording and Broadcasting Deceptive Advertisements
ߦ   Ringleader in NFL medical reimbursement scam pleads guilty
ߦ   COLD CASE: Darrence Kindle
ߦ   Jury Sentences Gregory Wise to Life in Prison for Murder
ߦ   Texas sidewalks, bike lanes to receive funding
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Executive Office Assistant Candice G. Wade
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Police Officer Charles E. Butler
ߦ   Deputy Juan Pena At Work
ߦ   Don't Say You Are a Cop When You Shoplift

 
Search Archives:

AUSTIN- Attorney General Paxton joined a Kentucky-led amicus brief to support Ohio’s petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in the capital case Shoop v. Cunningham, No. 21-1587. The Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit adopted a view of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that encourages harassment of jurors sitting in judgment on capital punishment cases because it invites evidence that impeaches the jury’s deliberations, which is both vague and inadmissible.  

 

The amicus brief argues that courts have long acknowledged the need to protect jurors from harassment to preserve the integrity of the jury process in criminal cases and urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment to prevent erosion of those protections. 

 

This Court has repeatedly recognized the important guardrails that underpin AEDPA, which require federal courts to respect the finality of state-court judgments,” the brief states. “Federal courts are prohibited from ‘needlessly prolong[ing]’ a case. . . . Yet nothing could be more needless than allowing a federal court to hold an evidentiary hearing to explore the ramifications of inadmissible evidence. 

 

To read a copy of the amicus brief click here. 

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2023 The Police News. All rights reserved.