Texas Police News.jpg
Galco.jpg
                  

  


 

AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
Austin
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Federal Appeals Court Finds South Carolina Judge Ignored Uncontested Evidence of Mental Illness, Reverses Death Sentence
ߦ   Former Oklahoma Governor and His Death Penalty Review Commission Co-Chair Call for Execution Halt
ߦ   Massive turnout for gun buyback event in Third Ward surprises city officials
ߦ   Reward offered for information leading to hit-and-run driver
ߦ   The Sun Can Kill You
ߦ   From The Archives
ߦ   AG Paxton Secures Important Victory in Fifth Circuit Against Imposing Harmful Mask-Mandates on Kids
ߦ   AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
ߦ   Armed Robber Arrested
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Sgt. Oliver E. Brown - Retired 1991
ߦ   Deputy Uncovers Theft Ring
ߦ   Ex-cops Kueng, Thao sentenced for violating Floyd’s rights
ߦ   Hope Is Why We're Here - Remembering Adam John Walsh
ߦ   Houston man who masterminded the hiding of 5-year-old Sierra Patino’s body sentenced to 40 years in prison
ߦ   Missing Juvenile - Cypress, Texas
ߦ   Robert Crimo III indicted on 117 counts in deadly Highland Park parade shooting, prosecutors say
ߦ   Activity Report
ߦ   Armed and Dangerous Fugitive is Wanted!
ߦ   Breaking: Supreme Court Hands Texas Another Win, Biden Another Loss on Border Security
ߦ   CEO of Titanium Blockchain Pleads Guilty in $21 Million Cryptocurrency Fraud Scheme

 
Search Archives:

AUSTIN- Attorney General Paxton joined a Kentucky-led amicus brief to support Ohio’s petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in the capital case Shoop v. Cunningham, No. 21-1587. The Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit adopted a view of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that encourages harassment of jurors sitting in judgment on capital punishment cases because it invites evidence that impeaches the jury’s deliberations, which is both vague and inadmissible.  

 

The amicus brief argues that courts have long acknowledged the need to protect jurors from harassment to preserve the integrity of the jury process in criminal cases and urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment to prevent erosion of those protections. 

 

This Court has repeatedly recognized the important guardrails that underpin AEDPA, which require federal courts to respect the finality of state-court judgments,” the brief states. “Federal courts are prohibited from ‘needlessly prolong[ing]’ a case. . . . Yet nothing could be more needless than allowing a federal court to hold an evidentiary hearing to explore the ramifications of inadmissible evidence. 

 

To read a copy of the amicus brief click here. 

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2022 The Police News. All rights reserved.