Texas Police News.jpg
                  

  


 

AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
Austin
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Katy Man Sentenced To 50 Years For Energy Corridor Murder
ߦ   Lufkin P.D. Arrests Man With 1 1/2 Lbs Methamphetamine
ߦ   Thirty-Seven Gang Members Plead Guilty to Racketeering Conspiracy
ߦ   This City Has Been Named Crime Capital of Texas
ߦ   VIDEO AVAILABLE: Coast Guard medevacs 2 from supply vessel 100 miles off Galveston, Texas
ߦ   Weekly Safety Report: Shootings and Assault in Galveston County, Texas
ߦ   FBI Releases 2022 Crime in the Nation Statistics
ߦ   20 Year Sentence In Auto-Ped Fatality
ߦ   ATF Agent Caught Smuggling Guns Into Mexico‚ĶAgain
ߦ   City of Fort Worth Public Safety News
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Police Officer James V. St John - Retired 2001
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired SPO Armando M. Ordaz - Retired 2020
ߦ   Death Notice - SPO Shidong Qian - Midwest Division
ߦ   Friendswood Police Activity Report
ߦ   League City Animal Care & Adoption Center Receives Beacon of No-Kill Excellence Award from Best Friends Animal Society for Commitment to Lifesaving
ߦ   Florida police union appeals judge's ruling on new law restricting public employee unions
ߦ   Law Enforcement Alert: Phone scam threatens warrant for arrest
ߦ   Tennessee contracting with 20 firms for $415 million law enforcement training project
ߦ   Texas Senate moves border bill that allows state police to arrest migrants at U.S.-Mexico border
ߦ   Be aware, be very aware! October is Cybersecurity Awareness Month

 
Search Archives:

AUSTIN- Attorney General Paxton joined a Kentucky-led amicus brief to support Ohio’s petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in the capital case Shoop v. Cunningham, No. 21-1587. The Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit adopted a view of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that encourages harassment of jurors sitting in judgment on capital punishment cases because it invites evidence that impeaches the jury’s deliberations, which is both vague and inadmissible.  

 

The amicus brief argues that courts have long acknowledged the need to protect jurors from harassment to preserve the integrity of the jury process in criminal cases and urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment to prevent erosion of those protections. 

 

This Court has repeatedly recognized the important guardrails that underpin AEDPA, which require federal courts to respect the finality of state-court judgments,” the brief states. “Federal courts are prohibited from ‘needlessly prolong[ing]’ a case. . . . Yet nothing could be more needless than allowing a federal court to hold an evidentiary hearing to explore the ramifications of inadmissible evidence. 

 

To read a copy of the amicus brief click here. 

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2023 The Police News. All rights reserved.