Texas Police News.jpg
Galco.jpg
                  

  


 

AG Paxton Supports SCOTUS Petition to Protect Jurors, Defend Federal Death Penalty Statute
Austin
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   Hutto Police Department - Hiring Police Officers
ߦ   Texas A&M University - Galveston
ߦ   Recruiting? Contact Texas Police News For Help Recruiting!
ߦ   Apple Will ‘Make Changes’ After HR Botches Sexual Abuse Allegations
ߦ   Crash victim's relative files $50M lawsuit against Galveston bar operator, others
ߦ   Final MS-13 gang member sentenced for fatal ambush of witness Defendant is seventh of seven defendants convicted
ߦ   Former Police Officer and Three Co-Defendants Indicted for Owning and Operating Illicit Massage Businesses
ߦ   Man charged with intoxication manslaughter after crash with victim riding scooter in Galveston
ߦ   Paris Police Dept. Activity Summary
ߦ   Texas man dies after drinking cloudy liquid as he's found guilty of child sexual assault
ߦ   Two Arrested in Operation Stolen PJ Trailer - Theft, Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle
ߦ   AG Paxton’s Criminal Prosecution Trial Team Secures Life Sentence for Sex Offender Who Shot Deputy in the Face
ߦ   California Man Pleads Guilty to $3.5 Million Scam-PAC Fraud
ߦ   Coast Guard medevacs crew member from bulk carrier vessel off Galveston
ߦ   Coast Guard rescues 3 from water after vessel capsizes near Port Isabel
ߦ   Death in Custody at Travis County Jail
ߦ   Death Notice - Retired Sgt. Donald L. Martin - Retired 1994
ߦ   Friendswood Police Activity Report
ߦ   Man charged with attempted murder
ߦ   Mardi Gras Sponsors Sought

   Next >>
 
Search Archives:

AUSTIN- Attorney General Paxton joined a Kentucky-led amicus brief to support Ohio’s petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in the capital case Shoop v. Cunningham, No. 21-1587. The Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit adopted a view of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that encourages harassment of jurors sitting in judgment on capital punishment cases because it invites evidence that impeaches the jury’s deliberations, which is both vague and inadmissible.  

 

The amicus brief argues that courts have long acknowledged the need to protect jurors from harassment to preserve the integrity of the jury process in criminal cases and urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment to prevent erosion of those protections. 

 

This Court has repeatedly recognized the important guardrails that underpin AEDPA, which require federal courts to respect the finality of state-court judgments,” the brief states. “Federal courts are prohibited from ‘needlessly prolong[ing]’ a case. . . . Yet nothing could be more needless than allowing a federal court to hold an evidentiary hearing to explore the ramifications of inadmissible evidence. 

 

To read a copy of the amicus brief click here. 

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
© 1999-2022 The Police News. All rights reserved.